Ms.Matashi
I have a Canon Digital Rebel XT and I was wondering what other kinds of non canon brand lenses can I use with my camera? Currently I use a Canon 50mm 1.8 and the 18-55mm kit lens.
Answer
Some lenses to consider are those from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina. On average, each lens does not do as well as their Canon or Nikon counterparts, but still get the job done. If you want quality, get Canon lenses. If you want a cheap alternative, go to the third party brands.
As for specifics, I use a Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 at the moment, but am going to upgrade to a 70-200mm VR once I save up enough money. The Tamron is good for the money, but slow to focus. I hear this also plagues the type with the built in motor.
The type of lens you want depends on the type of shooting you're going to do. If you shoot landscapes, look into a wide angle lens, such as the Sigma 10-20mm or Tamron 17-50mm. For telephoto zoom, the 70-200mm f2.8 Tamron would be a good option. I don't care too much for the Sigma, because there are issues with the outer coating. For portrait work, I've heard good things about the Tamron 90mm macro, or the Sigma 70mm macro. I have not used Tonkina, but some people say they are good, while others do not. I guess the same goes for Sigma, but not so much with Tamron.
Some lenses to consider are those from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina. On average, each lens does not do as well as their Canon or Nikon counterparts, but still get the job done. If you want quality, get Canon lenses. If you want a cheap alternative, go to the third party brands.
As for specifics, I use a Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 at the moment, but am going to upgrade to a 70-200mm VR once I save up enough money. The Tamron is good for the money, but slow to focus. I hear this also plagues the type with the built in motor.
The type of lens you want depends on the type of shooting you're going to do. If you shoot landscapes, look into a wide angle lens, such as the Sigma 10-20mm or Tamron 17-50mm. For telephoto zoom, the 70-200mm f2.8 Tamron would be a good option. I don't care too much for the Sigma, because there are issues with the outer coating. For portrait work, I've heard good things about the Tamron 90mm macro, or the Sigma 70mm macro. I have not used Tonkina, but some people say they are good, while others do not. I guess the same goes for Sigma, but not so much with Tamron.
Good Canon macro lens?
Bryan D
I just got a Canon Digital Rebel XSi (my first DSLR) a couple months ago and I was wanting to get a new lens before I went on my trip later this month. I already have 2 lenses: the standard 18-55mm f/3.5 that came with it and a 55-250mm that I got as part of a deal for buying with the camera. I was looking at some macro lenses:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-Macro-Digital-Cameras/dp/B0007WK8KS/ref=cm_cmu_pg_t
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-S-Macro-Digital-Cameras/dp/B0007WK8KS/ref=cm_cmu_pg_t
Which one is my better choice? or is there a better choice for a similar price? Also if you know where I can find either of these for cheaper that would be great to know too. (Please be as specific and technical as possible)
Thanks for your answer
sorry one of those links should be
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-100mm-USM-Cameras/dp/B00004XOM3/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1236614034&sr=1-4
Answer
If you are going to use macro to shoot things like insects, the 100mm is a good choice,because you don't have to get so close to the subject to have it fly away. However, if you are going to use macro to shoot stationary objects, like jewelry, coins, stamps, etc. then the EF 50mm f/2.5 compact macro can be had for about $200. It is a fast lens wich is great for low light/available light situations. Extremely versatile. With the Xsi 1.6 crop factor, this is now an 80mm, which is nice for portraiture as well. A very nice lens at an affordable price that does not match the exceptional quality you will enjoy for a couple hundred bucks. It has a magnification factor of 1:2. But when you attach Canon's Life-Size Converter, this combo delivers true 1:1 images. It is a sharp lens, and I mean "L" sharp. It has the best bokeh of any non-professional grade lens Canon makes. A sleeper that every Canon DSLR owner should add to their arsenal.
If you are going to use macro to shoot things like insects, the 100mm is a good choice,because you don't have to get so close to the subject to have it fly away. However, if you are going to use macro to shoot stationary objects, like jewelry, coins, stamps, etc. then the EF 50mm f/2.5 compact macro can be had for about $200. It is a fast lens wich is great for low light/available light situations. Extremely versatile. With the Xsi 1.6 crop factor, this is now an 80mm, which is nice for portraiture as well. A very nice lens at an affordable price that does not match the exceptional quality you will enjoy for a couple hundred bucks. It has a magnification factor of 1:2. But when you attach Canon's Life-Size Converter, this combo delivers true 1:1 images. It is a sharp lens, and I mean "L" sharp. It has the best bokeh of any non-professional grade lens Canon makes. A sleeper that every Canon DSLR owner should add to their arsenal.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Canon digital camera and other non canon lens?
Rating: 94% based on 99768 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank FOr Coming TO My Blog
Rating: 94% based on 99768 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank FOr Coming TO My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment