Ashraf Okd
btw who is better nikon or canon regarding
picture quality
user friendly
Answer
Canon EOS Rebel T1i 15.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera
http://astore.amazon.com/webfront-20/detail/B001XURPQS
The Journey Continues. Canon's new EOS Rebel T1i is packed with features, both refined and new. In addition to its admirable performance with an all-new 15.1 Megapixel Canon CMOS sensor, DIGIC 4 Image Processor, a 3.0-inch Clear View LCD with anti-reflective and scratch-resistant coating, and compatibility with the EOS System of lenses and Speedlites, the EOS Rebel T1i adds remarkable Full HD video capture at resolutions up to 1920 x 1080. An HDMI port allows for quick connections to high definition TVs and monitors for easy viewing of your stills and video. The entire operation is simple and easy even if you are a beginner. You'll have uncompromised EOS Digital performance with power and flexibility right in the palm of your hand.
Review: I've had the T1i for about almost week now and after some extensive use, here are my thoughts:
1. 15.1 megapixel sensor. Yes, the high megapixel count is impressive, but keep in mind that, as you approach higher resolutions, you need to ensure the lens on the SLR can resolve that much detail. Sadly, the included 18-55mm IS lens is functional, but the high resolution really shows the so-so quality of the lens. Even if taken at the proper focus, pictures can appear soft with this kit lens. Shots I have taken with Canon EF-S 17-85mm and EF 70-200mm L lenses are crisp. I don't have any gripes on image quality. There are some issues with noise on the higher ISOs that don't seem to show up on the Nikon digitals, but overall, the quality is amazing for the price. Skin tones, textures, colors are reproduced very accurately.
2. Digic 4. The Digic 4 processor appears to process/save the 15 megapixel images in the same time (if not faster) than the Digic III processor on the XSi (even in RAW+Jpg mode). I have also noticed that at higher ISOs, the sensor and the Digic 4 produce images with less overall noise compared with its predecessors.
3. LCD. The 920,000 pixel LCD screen is large (3"), crisp, vibrant and fully visible even in bright sunlight. In comparison, the Canon XSi SLR (which the T1i replaces), also has a 3" LCD, but with 230,000 pixels. The viewing angle is great as well and the LCD can easily be seen nearly 180 degrees around.
5. Penta-mirror. That Canon is still using one in the T1i is disappointing. The penta-mirror viewfinder image is functional, but still noticeably darker than that of the penta-prism viewfinder in the Nikon D90 (which is the T1i's main competitor). I really would have preferred if Canon had kept the XSi's 12.2 megapixel sensor, forgone 1080p video altogether, and maybe upped the cost of the camera slightly to cover the production cost of using a penta-prism in the T1i. Honestly, unless you are massively cropping your images, or creating large photos, the difference between 12.2 and 15.1 megapixels really is negligible.
6. Size. This is the same body as the XSi, and therefore a bit on the smaller side compared to other digital SLRs. I have small hands, so the T1i is comfortable for me. If you have big hands, I can see this being a very difficult camera to use over an extended period of time. If you haven't handled a Canon XT, XTi or XSi, I would suggest you go to a store and hold the T1i yourself before purchasing it online. (I will upload a picture of the T1i in my hands to the user gallery for a size reference.)
7. HD Video. Yes, the Canon marketing department made a horrible marketing decision and pushed the T1i onto shelves limiting the 1080p recording to 20fps (frames per second). Recognize this as a marketing gimmick that allows them put a 1080p sticker on the camera box. The 1080p @ 20fps is fine most times, but seems a choppy if you have a lot of action in the frame or are panning quickly. The T1i's 720p video is recorded at 30fps and is clean, smooth, and sufficient for all but the most discerning consumers. One major criticism though is that the sound is recorded in mono, AND there is NO input for an external microphone.
Ultimately, you shouldn't let the HD recording limitations sway you one way or the other. This is an SLR camera -- not a video camera. The HD video is a great feature, but if you're looking for something primarily to take video, look elsewhere. There are much better, cheaper VIDEO cameras out there which can record true 1080p.
Canon EOS Rebel T1i 15.1 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera
http://astore.amazon.com/webfront-20/detail/B001XURPQS
The Journey Continues. Canon's new EOS Rebel T1i is packed with features, both refined and new. In addition to its admirable performance with an all-new 15.1 Megapixel Canon CMOS sensor, DIGIC 4 Image Processor, a 3.0-inch Clear View LCD with anti-reflective and scratch-resistant coating, and compatibility with the EOS System of lenses and Speedlites, the EOS Rebel T1i adds remarkable Full HD video capture at resolutions up to 1920 x 1080. An HDMI port allows for quick connections to high definition TVs and monitors for easy viewing of your stills and video. The entire operation is simple and easy even if you are a beginner. You'll have uncompromised EOS Digital performance with power and flexibility right in the palm of your hand.
Review: I've had the T1i for about almost week now and after some extensive use, here are my thoughts:
1. 15.1 megapixel sensor. Yes, the high megapixel count is impressive, but keep in mind that, as you approach higher resolutions, you need to ensure the lens on the SLR can resolve that much detail. Sadly, the included 18-55mm IS lens is functional, but the high resolution really shows the so-so quality of the lens. Even if taken at the proper focus, pictures can appear soft with this kit lens. Shots I have taken with Canon EF-S 17-85mm and EF 70-200mm L lenses are crisp. I don't have any gripes on image quality. There are some issues with noise on the higher ISOs that don't seem to show up on the Nikon digitals, but overall, the quality is amazing for the price. Skin tones, textures, colors are reproduced very accurately.
2. Digic 4. The Digic 4 processor appears to process/save the 15 megapixel images in the same time (if not faster) than the Digic III processor on the XSi (even in RAW+Jpg mode). I have also noticed that at higher ISOs, the sensor and the Digic 4 produce images with less overall noise compared with its predecessors.
3. LCD. The 920,000 pixel LCD screen is large (3"), crisp, vibrant and fully visible even in bright sunlight. In comparison, the Canon XSi SLR (which the T1i replaces), also has a 3" LCD, but with 230,000 pixels. The viewing angle is great as well and the LCD can easily be seen nearly 180 degrees around.
5. Penta-mirror. That Canon is still using one in the T1i is disappointing. The penta-mirror viewfinder image is functional, but still noticeably darker than that of the penta-prism viewfinder in the Nikon D90 (which is the T1i's main competitor). I really would have preferred if Canon had kept the XSi's 12.2 megapixel sensor, forgone 1080p video altogether, and maybe upped the cost of the camera slightly to cover the production cost of using a penta-prism in the T1i. Honestly, unless you are massively cropping your images, or creating large photos, the difference between 12.2 and 15.1 megapixels really is negligible.
6. Size. This is the same body as the XSi, and therefore a bit on the smaller side compared to other digital SLRs. I have small hands, so the T1i is comfortable for me. If you have big hands, I can see this being a very difficult camera to use over an extended period of time. If you haven't handled a Canon XT, XTi or XSi, I would suggest you go to a store and hold the T1i yourself before purchasing it online. (I will upload a picture of the T1i in my hands to the user gallery for a size reference.)
7. HD Video. Yes, the Canon marketing department made a horrible marketing decision and pushed the T1i onto shelves limiting the 1080p recording to 20fps (frames per second). Recognize this as a marketing gimmick that allows them put a 1080p sticker on the camera box. The 1080p @ 20fps is fine most times, but seems a choppy if you have a lot of action in the frame or are panning quickly. The T1i's 720p video is recorded at 30fps and is clean, smooth, and sufficient for all but the most discerning consumers. One major criticism though is that the sound is recorded in mono, AND there is NO input for an external microphone.
Ultimately, you shouldn't let the HD recording limitations sway you one way or the other. This is an SLR camera -- not a video camera. The HD video is a great feature, but if you're looking for something primarily to take video, look elsewhere. There are much better, cheaper VIDEO cameras out there which can record true 1080p.
From an owners view, which camera is better, the Canon Digital Rebel 450D or the Canon EOS-40D!?
Melissa
It would be very helpful to me if you were to answer my question =) I'm currently decided whether or not to buy either of these cameras! i foyu could suggest any particular lense which work veyr well with these cameras then it owuld be much appreciated!
*Please, no sarcastic remarks, thanks (:
(Had a few in a previous questions, wasn't nice!)
Thanks for all the help so far, I am starting to make up my mind, just for an additional detail, I mainly shoot landscapes and wildlife! =)
Answer
Hi again! In terms of comparison, the Canon 40D is the superior camera. It has a faster shooting rate (6.5 fps vs. the 450D's 3 fps), a better sensor, a larger, more ergonomical grip, and it has more adjustment capabilities. I have the 30D and it was a step up from my 350D.
However, I have a bit of background about your situation (hehe ^_^). Since you're just starting out, I would recommend you give the 450D another look. It'll be cheaper, it has enough functions for you to tweak with, and it'll give pretty awesome images too. Once you get a little more experience and more lenses, then you can consider upgrading your camera body.
It's all about the lenses, not the body. :) In the camera world, the lenses are the investment, and the bodies the accessories.
As for lenses:
For your landscapes, again, I'd recommend the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8. It's fast, it's sharp, and it's only $400 retail. If that's out of your budget, though, I'd stick with the kit lens for awhile. It'll give you decent images for less money. You'll want to be sure to buy digital-only lenses if you're going wide. Most lenses made today (the EF line) are meant for film and full-frame cameras. The 450D and 40D have smaller sensors and thus you have to factor in a conversion of 1.6x for all focal lengths.
Example: The lower the focal length, the wider your perspective. If you shot with the EF 17-40mm f/4L, since it's meant for a full-frame (larger sensor), it will actually give you 28-64mm coverage on your 450D's cropped sensor. 28mm isn't particularly wide for landscape shots. Thus, you'll have to buy from Canon's EF-S line, which are lenses made specifically for the smaller sensors of 450D and 40D.
The Tamron I mentioned is a digital-only lens, so it will give you the full 17-50mm coverage on your 450D/40D. You've seen the results using my 30D on my deviantart already, so that's my testament :)
For your wildlife shots, you're gonna need a long-range telephoto lens. These will cost a bit more, depending on your pickiness with quality.
If you're not a quality freak like I am, you can buy the Canon EF-S 55-200mm f/4.0-5.6 IS, the Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM, or something of that nature. These lenses cover a really large zoom range, and since you're trying to get closer to your subject, it won't matter whether you have an EF or EF-S lens. An EF lens would actually give you more zoom reach because of the crop factor. These lenses cost roughly from $250-$350 USD.
Note: You can use EF and EF-S lenses on the 450D/40D, as well as many third-party lenses.
Now, for a more expensive alternative: the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L. The "L" lenses are Canon's finest, with their best glass and weatherproof construction. This lens has a popular zoom range covered, a large, constant aperture, and is very lightweight. It's good for getting close up shots at the zoo and blurring the background around the animals. :) However, it retails for about £412 on Amazon.uk. A fine investment if you're going serious about shooting, otherwise it's not a useful purchase.
Hope this helps! Good luck again!
Hi again! In terms of comparison, the Canon 40D is the superior camera. It has a faster shooting rate (6.5 fps vs. the 450D's 3 fps), a better sensor, a larger, more ergonomical grip, and it has more adjustment capabilities. I have the 30D and it was a step up from my 350D.
However, I have a bit of background about your situation (hehe ^_^). Since you're just starting out, I would recommend you give the 450D another look. It'll be cheaper, it has enough functions for you to tweak with, and it'll give pretty awesome images too. Once you get a little more experience and more lenses, then you can consider upgrading your camera body.
It's all about the lenses, not the body. :) In the camera world, the lenses are the investment, and the bodies the accessories.
As for lenses:
For your landscapes, again, I'd recommend the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8. It's fast, it's sharp, and it's only $400 retail. If that's out of your budget, though, I'd stick with the kit lens for awhile. It'll give you decent images for less money. You'll want to be sure to buy digital-only lenses if you're going wide. Most lenses made today (the EF line) are meant for film and full-frame cameras. The 450D and 40D have smaller sensors and thus you have to factor in a conversion of 1.6x for all focal lengths.
Example: The lower the focal length, the wider your perspective. If you shot with the EF 17-40mm f/4L, since it's meant for a full-frame (larger sensor), it will actually give you 28-64mm coverage on your 450D's cropped sensor. 28mm isn't particularly wide for landscape shots. Thus, you'll have to buy from Canon's EF-S line, which are lenses made specifically for the smaller sensors of 450D and 40D.
The Tamron I mentioned is a digital-only lens, so it will give you the full 17-50mm coverage on your 450D/40D. You've seen the results using my 30D on my deviantart already, so that's my testament :)
For your wildlife shots, you're gonna need a long-range telephoto lens. These will cost a bit more, depending on your pickiness with quality.
If you're not a quality freak like I am, you can buy the Canon EF-S 55-200mm f/4.0-5.6 IS, the Canon EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM, or something of that nature. These lenses cover a really large zoom range, and since you're trying to get closer to your subject, it won't matter whether you have an EF or EF-S lens. An EF lens would actually give you more zoom reach because of the crop factor. These lenses cost roughly from $250-$350 USD.
Note: You can use EF and EF-S lenses on the 450D/40D, as well as many third-party lenses.
Now, for a more expensive alternative: the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L. The "L" lenses are Canon's finest, with their best glass and weatherproof construction. This lens has a popular zoom range covered, a large, constant aperture, and is very lightweight. It's good for getting close up shots at the zoo and blurring the background around the animals. :) However, it retails for about £412 on Amazon.uk. A fine investment if you're going serious about shooting, otherwise it's not a useful purchase.
Hope this helps! Good luck again!
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Canon EOS 450D Digital Rebel XSi or D5000 for a beginner photographer?
Rating: 94% based on 99768 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank FOr Coming TO My Blog
Rating: 94% based on 99768 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank FOr Coming TO My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment