canon digital camera 4500 image
curtismayf
in your opinion.
i wanna get one.
Answer
Just based on sheer cost alone? Hasselblad H3D-39. 39 megapixels. $32,000. It's medium format, and the lenses will cost you probably >$2,000 each, but mercy, the amount of range you can get out of those cameras...there's also the "lowly" Canon 1Ds Mark III, "only" 22 megapixels for $8,000.
If you're going for speed, Canon's 1D Mark III ($4500) does 10 frames per second at full resolution (10 megapixels), Nikon's D3 ($5000) does 9fps at full resolution (12 megapixels) and I think 11fps at 5 megapixels.
But anyway, dreams aside, if you're not looking for a digital SLR with all the bells and whistles, and you don't need the capability to change lenses, there are lots of "SLR like" point and shoot cameras that offer the basic modes as well as most of the advanced options offered on digital SLRs at a much lower cost point. Examples of this include the Canon S5 IS, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50, and Sony DSC H9. These cameras run probably $400-500, but they are really at a sweet spot in terms of price and features. All three of these cameras have high megapixel counts and have large zooms on them as well. Check out the link in my profile for more info.
Just based on sheer cost alone? Hasselblad H3D-39. 39 megapixels. $32,000. It's medium format, and the lenses will cost you probably >$2,000 each, but mercy, the amount of range you can get out of those cameras...there's also the "lowly" Canon 1Ds Mark III, "only" 22 megapixels for $8,000.
If you're going for speed, Canon's 1D Mark III ($4500) does 10 frames per second at full resolution (10 megapixels), Nikon's D3 ($5000) does 9fps at full resolution (12 megapixels) and I think 11fps at 5 megapixels.
But anyway, dreams aside, if you're not looking for a digital SLR with all the bells and whistles, and you don't need the capability to change lenses, there are lots of "SLR like" point and shoot cameras that offer the basic modes as well as most of the advanced options offered on digital SLRs at a much lower cost point. Examples of this include the Canon S5 IS, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50, and Sony DSC H9. These cameras run probably $400-500, but they are really at a sweet spot in terms of price and features. All three of these cameras have high megapixel counts and have large zooms on them as well. Check out the link in my profile for more info.
what is the best digital SLR camera?
tophel
Price not a factor.
Answer
Since you didn't elaborate (other than to say that price is not a factor), I have no clue what type of photography you do/plan to do.
For example, if you shoot sports, you want a fast focus and high frame rate. For that, I'd recommend the Canon 1DMkIII. 10Mpixel, Canon's 1-series autofocus, 10 frames per second, ability to record to two cards (SD and CF) simultaneously, and built like a tank. Around $4500, no lenses.
If you shoot weddings, I'd recommend either of Canon's full-frame cameras: a Canon 5D ($2200) which is smaller, lighter, and with 12+ Mpixel, fantastic, or Canon 1DsMkII (or the new MkIII at $8000) which has Canon's 1-series autofocus, 16.7 Mpixel (or 22+ Mpixel for the Mark III), and absolutely fantastic. Lenses are not included with any of these.
If you shoot magazine spreads, either the Canon 1DsMkII (or MkIII) or, if price is really not an object, the Hasselblad H3D-39: 39 Mpixel, medium format, best-of-the-best camera for $30,000. Yes, $30k. And, no, that doesn't include any lenses.
However, the camera isn't the only thing that makes fantastic photographs. Your lens choice and quality have big, BIG, BIG, effects on quality.
Oh, and so does the photographer. Put the H3D Hassy is a random Joe's hand, and he will generate terrible photographs. Sure, they'd be high-quality crap, but crap none the less.
Can I recommend posting this question again with more insight as to what you want to photograph?
Since you didn't elaborate (other than to say that price is not a factor), I have no clue what type of photography you do/plan to do.
For example, if you shoot sports, you want a fast focus and high frame rate. For that, I'd recommend the Canon 1DMkIII. 10Mpixel, Canon's 1-series autofocus, 10 frames per second, ability to record to two cards (SD and CF) simultaneously, and built like a tank. Around $4500, no lenses.
If you shoot weddings, I'd recommend either of Canon's full-frame cameras: a Canon 5D ($2200) which is smaller, lighter, and with 12+ Mpixel, fantastic, or Canon 1DsMkII (or the new MkIII at $8000) which has Canon's 1-series autofocus, 16.7 Mpixel (or 22+ Mpixel for the Mark III), and absolutely fantastic. Lenses are not included with any of these.
If you shoot magazine spreads, either the Canon 1DsMkII (or MkIII) or, if price is really not an object, the Hasselblad H3D-39: 39 Mpixel, medium format, best-of-the-best camera for $30,000. Yes, $30k. And, no, that doesn't include any lenses.
However, the camera isn't the only thing that makes fantastic photographs. Your lens choice and quality have big, BIG, BIG, effects on quality.
Oh, and so does the photographer. Put the H3D Hassy is a random Joe's hand, and he will generate terrible photographs. Sure, they'd be high-quality crap, but crap none the less.
Can I recommend posting this question again with more insight as to what you want to photograph?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: What is the best dig. camera and how much does it cost??
Rating: 94% based on 99768 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank FOr Coming TO My Blog
Rating: 94% based on 99768 ratings. 4,5 user reviews.
Author: Unknown
Thank FOr Coming TO My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment